Where do you sit in the current debate on delaying or banning smartphones for young teenagers? Jonathan Haidt, author of Anxious Generation, is advocating for no phones before the age of 14 and no social media until16.
Meanwhile, Dr Lucy Foulkes - who's a psychologist at the University of Oxford where her group researches adolescent mental health - says that demonising phone use, and banning social media, is causing enormous problems for parents and not necessarily solving the issues effectively.
She argues there's a strong narrative coming through that online is bad and offline is good, which is missing the mark in understanding the benefits and issues of both.
I think for some time there wasn't enough discussion and action over the impact of devices on the lives of children, but have we overswung the pendulum?
Personally, I do think boundaries on their use are vital and for a long time I've thought schools should be phone-free, but for that to work it needs to be wholeheartedly accepted and encouraged by parents because teachers and schools can't be expected to do all of the heavy lifting.
I also think there should be public messaging for parents, encouraging a delay in smartphone introduction until secondary school at the earliest.
But I'm just one parent, and I hear a lot of excellent arguments for a different approach, which is why being judgemental over the choices of other parents isn't helping any of us.
If you'd like to hear Dr Lucy Foulkes talk in more detail about both teenage mental health issues, and a healthy approach to devices, make sure you listen to the whole interview, by clicking the link at the end.